Comparative Study of Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau on the Origin of State
January 14, 2025 | by aashishgautam265@gmail.com

The concept of the origin of the state has been analyzed differently by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Below is a comparative study based on key steps:
1. State of Nature (SoN):The state of nature is a hypothetical situation where humans lived without a formal state or government, akin to the Stone Age.
Hobbes: Described the SoN as a state of constant fear, conflict, and chaos, where life was “nasty, brutish, and short.”
Locke: Viewed the SoN as a state of relative peace, guided by mutual obligations and natural law.
Rousseau: Depicted the SoN as a state of blissful harmony, where humans lived freely and innocently, uncorrupted by society.
2. Human Nature:
Hobbes: Believed humans are selfish, aggressive, egoistic, and fearful.
Locke: Humans as rational and capable of cooperation, guided by reason and morality.
Rousseau: Described humans as “noble savages,” inherently good but later corrupted by society.
3. Purpose of the Social Contract:
Hobbes: To ensure self-preservation and escape the anarchy of the SoN.
Locke: To protect life, liberty, and property through a just government.
Rousseau: To regain freedom and equality lost in the transition from the SoN to a structured society.
4. Formation of the Social Contract:
Hobbes: Individuals surrendered all their rights except right to self preservation to an absolute sovereign (the Leviathan), who held unlimited power to maintain order and security.
Locke: People transferred limited rights (legislative, executive, and judicial powers) to a representative government. The government’s power was constrained to serve the people’s interests.
Rousseau: Power was transferred to the “general will,” representing collective sovereignty. This led to direct democracy, where individuals collectively made and obeyed the laws.
Application of the Social Contract in Modern States
1. Hobbesian Contract: The principles of Hobbes’ social contract can be observed in countries like North Korea, where the state wields absolute power. Citizens have no liberties or rights apart from the basic right to life, as all authority is concentrated in the hands Ruler king jong.
2. Lockean Contract: Locke’s idea of a social contract is evident in countries like the United States of America, where the government operates on the principle of separation of powers among the legislature, executive, and judiciary. Fundamental rights, such as life, liberty, and property, are protected under constitutional frameworks.
3. Rousseau’s Contract: Rousseau’s vision of the social contract is exemplified by Switzerland, where direct democracy still thrives. Citizens actively participate in decision-making processes, ensuring liberty and equality in governance.
RELATED POSTS
View all